PIMA COUNTY
Community Participation and
Mitigation Ordinance (1989)
Passed 1992
ORDINANCE NO. 1992-69

AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA, ADOPTING A GENERAL PROCEDURE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW AND COMMENT ON PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT OF MAJOR ROUTE PUBLIC ROADWAYS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS, PUBLIC PARTICIPATION, COMMUNITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE INVOLVEMENT, MITIGATION MEASURES AND IMPROVED DESIGN CRITERIA, AND REPEALING ORDINANCE 1989-125

WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 11-251(4) of the Arizona Revised Statues, the Board of Supervisors may lay out, maintain, control and mange public roads, and

WHEREAS, the Pima Association of Governments developed a Regional Long Range Transportation Plan and Air Quality Plan and Ten-Year Transportation and Expenditure Plan (Regional Transportation Plan) for eastern Pima County.

IT IS HEREBY ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Pima County, Arizona, that Ordinance 1989-125 is hereby repealed, and the "Community Participation and Mitigation Ordinance" is adopted as follows:

COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND MITIGATION ORDINANCE

Section 1 PURPOSE

The purpose of this ordinance is to ensure that, with respect to proposed major roadway improvement projects,

(1) adequate consideration is given to possible social, economic, environmental, and transportation effects,

(2) appropriate considerations given to reasonable alternatives,

(3) interested parties are afforded an opportunity to express their views early enough in the study process to influence the course of studies as well as the action taken, and

(4) decisions on projects are made in the overall public interest.

Section 2 APPLICATION

This ordinance shall apply to proposed major roadway projects constructed by Pima County. This ordinance shall be a policy statement and guide for proposed major roadway improvement projects constructed jointly by Pima County and other agencies or jurisdictions. For purposes of this ordinance, the term "major roadway" means a roadway depicted on the Pima County Major Streets and Routes Plan and which is classified and functions as an arterial roadway. This ordinance shall not apply to the following:

(1) Overlay or maintenance of an existing roadway;

(2) Addition of paved shoulder, bike lanes, or multi-use lanes to an existing roadway;

(3) Pavement widening of an existing roadway which does not increase the number of through traffic lanes;

(4) Traffic control or warning device installation projects;

(5) Changes or improvements to the right-of-way area outside the shoulder of an existing roadway;

(6) Drainage improvements; and

(7) Safety improvements.

Section 3 GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS

To promote compatibility between proposed major route improvements and surrounding properties, the following shall be considered for each proposed project:

Environmental effects: Effects of the proposed project on the environment, including but not limited to noise, air quality, and wildlife.

Neighborhood impacts: Protection of existing neighborhoods and minimizing negative impacts from a proposed project.

Alternative Transportation Modes: Features for alternate modes of transportation as a part of the proposed project.

Cost: Cost and budget limitations incorporated throughout the design and construction of a project.

Section 4 PROCEDURES

Section 4.1 Project Initiation

A project may be initiated after the desirability and necessity for the project is established by action of the Board of Supervisors or by inclusion of the improvement in the Regional Transportation Plan adopted by the Pima Association of Governments.

Section 4.2 Transportation Action Plan

A Transportation Action Plan shall be prepared by or for the Pima County Department of Transportation staff for all proposed major roadway projects. The Transportation Action Plan shall (1) contain the information detailed on Exhibit 1, (2) define the project and its limits, (3) describe the major design features, location, and possible alternatives, and (4) include a recommendation of whether a Location Report (Section 4.3) should be prepared for the project.

The Transportation Action Plan shall be submitted in draft form to the Board of Supervisors for action at a regularly scheduled meeting. If approved, a final report of the Transportation Action Plan shall be prepared, incorporating amendments adopted by the Board of Supervisors. Approval of a Transportation Action Plan by the Board of Supervisors shall include a final determination of whether a Location Report shall be prepared for the project.

Section 4.3 Location Report

A Location Report is a recommended final right of way alignment based on a comparative study of all reasonable alternative right of way alignments. The Location Report shall include a general overview of anticipated environmental impact for each alignment. The Location Report shall contain the information detailed on Exhibit 2.

A Location Report is appropriate where (1) the proposed project is a new roadway on a new alignment, (2) the proposed roadway has virtually no existing right-of-way, or (3) there are significant alignment choices to be made between the identified project termination points. A Location Report is not appropriate where (1) the established or existing right of way is not of adequate width in accordance with the Major Streets and Routes Plan, (2) the alignment variations are continuous with the existing road right-of-way and location, (3) additional right-of-way is needed only to accommodate minor alignment alterations or intersection widening, (4) alignments for the roadway were established prior to the initiation of the Transportation Action Plan.

After the Location Report is completed, the Board of Supervisors shall hold a public hearing to determine the final right of way alignment. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Board of Supervisors may approve any of the alternative alignments studied in the Location Report, may order the preparation of a new Location Report, or may order that the project be terminated or delayed.

Section 4.4 Environmental Assessment and Mitigation Report

An Environmental Assessment and Mitigation Report shall be prepared after completion of the Location Report and Board of Supervisors approval of a final right of way alignment. If no Location Report is prepared, the Environmental Assessment and Mitigation Report shall be prepared after Board of Supervisors approval of the Transportation Action Plan.

The Environmental Assessment and Mitigation Report shall identify adverse impacts of the proposed project and shall provide recommendations for mitigation measures which may be undertaken to minimize the adverse impacts. The Environmental Assessment and Mitigation Report shall contain the information detailed on Exhibit 3.

After the Environmental Assessment and Mitigation Report is completed, the Board of Supervisors shall hold a public hearing to determine the mitigation components to be incorporated into the project. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Board of Supervisors may approve any of the mitigation measures considered in the Environmental Assessment and Mitigation Report, may order the preparation of a new Environmental Assessment and Mitigation Report, or may order that the project be terminated or delayed. Approval of mitigation components after the Board of Supervisors hearing on the Environmental Assessment and Mitigation Report shall constitute authorization to prepare Construction Documents and to acquire right t-of-way for the project.

Section 4.5 Construction Documents

Construction Documents shall be prepared in conformance with the action taken by the Board of Supervisors on the Environmental Assessment and Mitigation Report. Any deviations from the Board's action shall be identified in a Project Summary Report, which shall be sent to the Board with the request for permission to advertise for bids for the project.

Section 5 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION

It is the policy of Pima County to promote public involvement and comment during preparation of any Location Report or Environmental Assessment and Mitigation Report for proposed roadway improvement projects for major route roadways constructed by Pima County.

Section 5.1 Project Mailing List

The Pima County Department of Transportation and Flood Control District shall maintain a project mailing list for each project subject to this ordinance. The mailing list shall be used for all mailed notifications required to be made under this ordinance. The project mailing list shall consist of all owners of properties located within at least a one-quarter mile wide corridor along the alignment of the proposed project, based on the latest available records of the Pima County Assessor's Office. In addition, the list shall contain the names of all businesses and the president or secretary of each homeowner association officially registered with Pima County adjacent to the project corridor. Throughout the project implementation process, this mailing list shall be expended to include any additional resident who requests to be included in the mailings.

Section 5.2 Establishment of Community Advisory Committee

For each project subject to this ordinance, a Community Advisory Committee shall be established by the Department of Transportation to provide input and feedback to the Department of Transportation concerning any proposed Location Report or Environmental Assessment and Mitigation Report relating to the project. The Community Advisory Committee shall function as set forth in Section 6 below.

Section 5.3 Public Open House Meetings

A Public Open House Meeting shall be held at least once during the process of completing a Location Report or an Environmental Assessment and Mitigation Report. A general public invitation to each Public Open House Meeting shall be given in a display ad published in at least one daily newspaper of general circulation Pima County not less that fifteen and not more than thirty calendar days before the Meeting. The display ad shall include a project location map, a rendering of the proposed project, and a description of the prominent features of the proposed project. Invitations to each Public Open House Meeting shall be sent by first class mail to each person on the mailing list (see Section 5.1).

Public Open House Meetings shall be held in reasonable proximity to the proposed project. Illustrations to assist the public to visualize the proposed project shall be available for public viewing at each Public Open House Meeting, and Pima County staff and consultants shall be available to answer questions about the proposed project. The public shall have access to the illustrations, staff and consultants for at east a two hour period for each Public Open House Meeting. Following the Public Open House Meeting, the illustrations utilized at the meeting shall be offered for continued public exposure at locations convenient for public display.

Section 5.4 Public Opinion Surveys

After each Public Open House Meeting, Public Opinion Surveys shall be sent by first class mail to each person on the mailing list (see Section 5.1), soliciting public opinion concerning key design, environmental impact and mitigation issues. The survey results shall be tallied, and the survey results shall be reported, along with the number of questionnaires sent and the percentage of responses obtained, to the Board of Supervisors at or before the hearing on the Location Report or Environmental Assessment and Mitigation Report.

Section 5.5 Project Status Reports

After appointment of a Community Advisory Committee for a project, the Department of Transportation shall prepare and submit project status reports to the Community Advisory Committee whenever there is a substantial change in the project status.

Section 5.6 Report and Executive Summary for Board of Supervisors Hearing

A Location Report or Environmental Assessment and Mitigation Report shall be delivered to the Board of Supervisors at least thirty days before the public hearing, along with an Executive Summary of the report prepared by or for the Pima County Department of Transportation. The Executive Summary shall explain whether and to what extent the opinions, requests and suggestions of the Community Advisory Committee were incorporated in the Location Report or the Environmental Assessment and Mitigation Report.

Section 5.7 Board of Supervisors Hearing Notification

Notice of Board of Supervisors public Hearings shall be published in at least one daily newspaper of general circulation in Pima County not less than thirty and not more than forty-five calendar days before any Board of Supervisors public hearing required by this Ordinance. Note of the public hearing shall also be sent by first class mail to each person on the mailing list (see Section 5.1). The Location Report or Environmental Assessment and Mitigation Report to be considered at the hearing shall be available for public review at the time the hearing notice is published.

Section 6 COMMUNITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE

The function of each project's Community Advisory Committee is to provide input and feedback to the Pima County Department of Transportation during the preparation of any Location Report or Environmental Assessment and Mitigation Report for the project, so that ample consideration is given to the concerns of those who are most directly affected by a project.

Section 6.1 Committee Membership

Each Community Advisory Committee shall consist of between three and eleven members. Two to five members shall own property or reside immediately adjacent to the proposed improvement. One to four members may own property or reside within an approximate one-quarter mile corridor but not immediately adjacent to the proposed improvement. Up to two members may own property or reside outside of the one-quarter mile corridor. Preference will be given to property owners and representatives of homeowners' and merchants' associations.

Section 6.2 Committee Formation

To solicit volunteers for membership on a project's Community Advisory Committee, notices shall be mailed to all whose names appear on the project mailing list (see Section 5.1), and an advertisement shall be published at least once in a newspaper of general circulation in Pima County not less than fifteen days before appointment of members. The notice shall contain a brief description of the proposed improvements and information on obtaining an application for membership on the Community Advisory Committee. The notice shall specify the maximum number and composition of the Community Advisory Committee, along with a deadline for receiving applications. The Director of the Department of Transportation shall appoint each Community Advisory Committee.

Section 6.3 Committee Functions and Duties

Community Advisory Committee members shall attend meetings as called by either the Department of Transportation or the chair, generally at regularly intervals during project development through the end of construction.

The Department of Transportation shall provide Community Advisory Committee Members with training materials, construction documents, and copies of this ordinance, and shall explain operating procedures, duties and responsibilities of membership.

The Community Advisory Committee shall elect a chairperson, who shall conduct meetings and supervise the preparation of the Community Advisory Committee Report.

The Community Advisory Committee shall review the Location Report, the Environmental Assessment and Mitigation Report, and the Construction Documents, based on the meeting schedule set forth in Section 6.6 below. The Community Advisory Committee shall prepare a report containing the Committee's opinions, requests and suggestions concerning the Location Report, the Environmental Assessment and Mitigation Report, Project Summary Report and any other matter listed in Section 6.4 below. The Community Advisory Committee Report may suggest a priority for elements of the proposed improvements, including the Committee's priorities for allocation of mitigation resources available to the project.

The Community Advisory Committee Report shall be presented to the Department of Transportation at least 45 days before the Board of Supervisors public hearing on the Location Report or Environmental Assessment and Mitigation Report. A copy of the Community Advisory Committee Report shall be presented to each member of the Board of Supervisors with the Location Report or Environmental Assessment and Mitigation Report (see Section 5.6).

After construction, the Community Advisory Committee shall provide a post-construction evaluation of the project. The evaluation shall analyze whether the construction has achieved the mitigation goals identified in the Environmental Assessment and Mitigation Report.

Section 6.4 Permitted Scope of Review

The Community Action Committee may review any aspect of the following items, including mitigation methods, except as limited by Section 6.5 below:

(1) The Location Report, which identifies the roadway location within the corridor identified by the Transportation Action Plan.

(2) The Environmental Assessment and Mitigation Report, including

(a) Neighborhood factors, such as

(i) Noise abatement methods,

(ii) Streetscape themes,

(iii) Architectural treatments,

(iv) Street lighting,

(v) Access control and mitigation, and

(vi) Other neighborhood impacts;

(b) Environmental factors, such as

(i) View shed treatments, and

(ii) Landscaping theme;

(c) Alternate Modes considerations, such as

(i) Pedestrian facilities,

(ii) Equestrian crossings, and

(iii) Alternative travel modes (for example, public bus and bicycle facilities); and

(d) Cost considerations.

Section 6.5 Matters Not to be Reviewed for Change

The Community Advisory Committee may request information regarding the following but shall not alter these requirements or their applicability:

(1) The Transportation Action Plan

(2) Pima County Ordinances

(3) Pima County Department of Transportation and Flood Control District engineering design standards and procedures

(4) Federal Highway Administration, Arizona Department of transportation Standards, American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials, and the Institute of Traffic Engineers design criteria, and other generally accepted engineering and safety principles and standards

(5) Pima County Regional Long Range Transportation Plan roadway designations

(6) Pima County Department of Transportation adopted typical roadway cross sections

(7) Pima County Department of Transportation design and posted speed limit standards and procedures

(8) Pima Association of Government traffic projection modeling

(9) Pima County Capital Improvements Program funding allocation

(10) Federal and State historic, cultural, and archaeological site protection requirements

(11) Federal and State endangered species protection requirements

(12) Federal and State wildlife habitat protection requirements

(13) The Americans With Disabilities Act

Section 6.6 Community Advisory Committee Meetings

The following meeting schedule is recommended for each Community Advisory Committee. Progress drafts of the report or documents under consideration shall be available prior to each respective meeting:
Item under consideration
Suggested number of meetings
Community Advisory Committee Meeting Schedule
Location Report
3
A meeting when the draft report is initiated, one when it is completed, and one when the final report is completed 
Environmental Assessment and Mitigation Report 
3
A meeting when the draft report is initiated, one when it is completed, and one when the final report is completed 
Construction Documents 
Optional
As the Construction Documents are being prepared, the project team shall provide the Community Advisory Committee with reports identifying deviations from the approved Environmental Assessment and Mitigation Report. The Committee may meet as it deems necessary to review the Construction Documents based upon this report. 
Post-construction 
1
Upon completion of the project 

Section 7 MITIGATION MEASURES AND DESIGN CRITERIA

General and specific impact mitigation measures as approved by the Board of Supervisors as a result of the public hearing on the Environmental Assessment and Mitigation Report shall be utilized to mitigate adverse impacts of each major roadway project. Mitigation includes measures to (a) avoid the impact altogether by not taking a certain action or selected elements of a proposed action, (b) minimize impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation, (c) rectify the impact by repairing, rehabilitation, or restoring the affected environment, (d) reduce or eliminate the impact over time by preservation and maintenance activities during the life of the action, or (e) compensate for the impact by replacing or providing substitute resources or environments. Improved design criteria can improve traffic service, effectiveness of the transportation investment, and neighborhood protection and mitigation measures.

Section 7.1 Mitigation Measures

The following mitigation measures shall be implemented for each major route project covered by this ordinance:

(1) Neighborhood

(a) Area Adjoining Roadway The primary purpose of the area between the roadway improvements and the right-of-way line shall be to mitigate adverse effects of highway development on adjacent land uses and provide an aesthetically pleasing environment. Therefore, the following uses are permitted: installation of noise walls, screens, or berms; landscaping; facilities for public bus, pedestrian, equestrian, and/or bicycle use; underground utilities; drainage system components, safety appurtenances, and environmental mitigation measures. Overhead utilities are permitted only when the cost of placing the utilities underground causes the project budget to be exceeded or when the voltage exceeds 14,000 volts. Where native vegetation exists, a design goal shall be to conserve and incorporate this vegetation within the project landscaping plan.

(b) Neighborhood Traffic Intrusion Major routes shall be designed to minimize neighborhood traffic intrusion. Where local street connections offer a bypass or shortcut between major routes and highways which in the opinion of the Board of Supervisors has a substantial adverse impact on neighborhood traffic, such streets shall be closed to through traffic.

(c) Noise Abatement Noise abatement shall be incorporated into the project design to protect inhabited residential or other sensitive land uses from roadway traffic noise. Noise abatement measures shall be considered for these and uses when existing or design year projections of exterior traffic noise measurements exceed an hourly A-weighted sound level of 67 dBA. The preferred method of noise abatement shall be the construction of noise barrier walls. Other methods may be utilized if the cost to Pima County does not exceed the cost of noise barrier walls.

(2) Environmental

(a) Preservation of Environmentally or Ecologically Sensitive Areas Where possible, the location of major route improvements shall avoid areas of significant environmental and ecological sensitivity. Where major route improvements are adjacent to areas of unique environmental or ecological sensitivity, acquisition in fee simple, acquisition of development rights, or conservation easements may be proposed by the appropriate Environmental Assessment and Mitigation Report.

(b) Landscaping All medians and right-of-way areas on major routes shall be landscaped with drought resistant, low pollinating, preferably native plants. Plant species shall be listed as permissible pursuant to the landscaping requirements of the Pima County Zoning Code. The landscaping theme of each major route shall be compatible with the native landscape through which the roadway passes. Installation of landscaping shall begin not later than six months after the formal completion date of the roadway improvements.

(c) Dust Abatement Curbs or paved roadway shoulders shall be provided adjacent to through traffic lanes to minimize air borne dust generated by vehicular traffic.

(d) Scenic Route Designations A visual impact analysis shall be included in any Environmental Assessment and Mitigation Report prepared for improvements on major routes designated as scenic routes.

(3) Alternate Modes

(a) Bicycle and Pedestrian Considerations The outside lane width for any urban (curbed) major route arterial shall be increased a minimum of eight feet to accommodate bicycles and other uses. The outside lane width for any rural (non-curbed) major route arterial shall be increased a minimum of five feet. Physically separated bicycle paths shall be examined as a design alternative where right-of-way widths are 200 feet or greater and side street and driveway connections are limited.

(b) Transit Vehicles The project design shall consider mass transit vehicle pullouts if bus or other mass transit services are available or planned along the proposed improvement.

(c) Park and Ride Facilities To facilitate carpooling, ridesharing, and mass public transportation ridership, additional right-of-way shall be considered in the vicinity of major intersections of major routes for the development of future park and ride facilities. Park and ride facilities shall be convenient and screened with landscaping.

Section 7.2 Roadway Design Criteria

The following improved design concepts shall be implemented for each major route project covered by this ordinance:

(1) Grade Separated Intersection Constraints All grade separated roadway intersection components shall either be at or below the average natural elevation of surrounding property except at intersections with Interstate facilities or with mainline railroad facilities, or in locations where drainage requirements or major buried utilities make below-grade construction impractical or prohibitively costly

(2) Sidewalks Sidewalks shall be provided where warranted by pedestrian travel, and special consideration shall be given to pedestrian or bicycle crossings with major routes. Pedestrian overpasses/underpasses shall be considered for school crosswalks or school zones for existing public or private schools adjacent to any major route.

(3) Access and Local Street Connections Access to major roadways shall be restricted as set forth in Title 18 (Zoning) of the Pima County Code. The number of access points and local street connections to a major roadway shall be limited wherever practicable.

(4) Medians Whenever practicable, median openings shall be no closer than one-quarter mile increments. A minimum 24-foot wide, curbed, landscaped median shall be installed on all urban major roadways. Median openings shall be spaced to minimize the number of left turn conflicts on the major route, and shall be installed consistent with adjacent land uses. In any event, median openings shall be no closer than one-eight mile from any major street intersection or another median opening.

(5) Traffic Signal Locations Traffic signal installations shall be spaced not less than half a mile apart, and shall be coordinated, as feasible, to maximize continuous through traffic movement along the major route roadway.

Section 8 ADVANCE RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION

To minimize displacement, disruption, and right-of-way acquisition costs, and to maximize the effectiveness of mitigation measures, advance right-of-way acquisition may be proposed in the Transportation Action Plan or the Environmental Assessment and Mitigation Report. Where funding is available, priority for consideration of advance acquisition shall be given to single family residences with sole, direct access to major routes, and to real property for which the inevitability of acquisition affects its marketability.

Section 9 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

Except as otherwise agreed to in a maintenance agreement duly authorized by the Board of Supervisors, all major route improvements including noise walls, landscape medians, and other similar features shall be maintained as part of Pima County's normal maintenance process.

Section 10 EXEMPTIONS AND VARIANCES

At any time before or during consideration of a proposed improvement, the Board of Supervisors may exempt the project or any portion of it from any or all procedural or substantive requirements of this ordinance. The Board of Supervisors may grant a variance from the specific application of any substantive requirement of this ordinance where the application of the provision will impose an unnecessary hardship on a property owner or on the general public.

An exemption or variance may be granted by the Board of Supervisors as part of the approval of the final road alignment (see Section 4.3). In that case, the public hearing notice required for consideration of the Location Report or the Environmental Assessment and Mitigation Report shall identify each recommended alternative which constitutes an exemption or waiver from the requirements of this ordinance. No further notice shall be required.

If not granted as part of the approval of the final road alignment or the mitigation components to be incorporated into the project, an exemption or variance maybe granted after a public hearing by the Board of Supervisors, at least one notice of which shall be published no less than fifteen days before the hearing in a newspaper of general circulation in Pima County.

Section 11 ANNUAL REPORT

Each year the Director of the Department of Transportation and Flood Control District shall prepare a report to the Board of Supervisors regarding the application, use, and effectiveness of this ordinance. The annual report shall contain a list of the projects to which this ordinance was applied in the past year, the status of each project, estimated costs of each project, and any suggested modifications to the procedures and processes of project implementation which would improve the effectiveness of this ordinance.
 

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of October, 1992.
 

PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA ATTEST:
 

Chairman, Board of Supervisors Clerk, Board of Supervisors
 
 

APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
 

Deputy County Attorney Director, Department of Transportation and Flood Control District
 

Exhibits

1. Transportation Action Plan Contents

2. Location Report Contents

3. Environmental Assessment and Mitigation Report Contents

TRANSPORTATION ACTION PLAN

Table of Contents

I. Introduction

A. Regional Transportation Plan

B. Proposed Improvement

C. Justification of Project

II. Improvement Specifics

A. Location and limits

B. Proposed design features

1. Design speed

2. Cross-section

3. Other

C. Alternatives

1. Alignments

2. Features

D. Mitigation Methods

1. Environmental

2. Neighborhood

3. Alternate Modes

III. Implementation

A. InterGovernmental Agreement Application

B. Funding Source(s)

C. Conceptual Cost Estimate

D. Timing

IV. Recommendation

A. Project Implementation Process

1. Location Study

2. Environmental Assessment and Mitigation Report

V. Exhibits

A. Location map

B. Graphic illustrations

Exhibit 1
LOCATION REPORT

Table of Contents

I. Introduction

A. Recommendation of Transportation Action Plan

II. Identification of Alternative Locations

A. Description of Roadway Alternatives

III. Comparative Impact Assessment and Analysis

A. Preliminary inventory of existing data

B. Comparative impact assessment

C. Evaluation of comparative impact assessment

D. Conclusions

IV. Recommendation

A. Proposed Action

B. Identification of potential impacts of preferred alignment requiring further analysis in the Environmental Assessment and Mitigation Report

1. Environmental

2. Neighborhood

3. Alternative Modes

4. Cost

V. Exhibits

A. Roadway Alternatives

B. Graphic illustrations
 
 
 
 

* An Executive Summary will be prepared which can be inserted at the beginning of this report.

Exhibit 2
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MITIGATION REPORT

Table of Contents

I. Introduction

A. Recommendation and Findings of:

Transportation Action Plan or Location Report

B. Direction by Board of Supervisors

II. Inventory of Existing Conditions

A. Environmental

1. Topography

2. Drainage

3. Vegetation

4. Wildlife

5. Viewsheds - Visual Analysis

6. Historical, Cultural and Archeological

7. Air Quality

8. Water Quality

B. Neighborhood

1. Adjoining Land Uses and Property Values

2. Recreation

3. Access

4. Character

5. Utilities

6. Noise

C. Alternative Modes

III. Detailed Environmental Impact Assessment

A. Environmental

1. Topography

2. Drainage

3. Vegetation

4. Wildlife

5. Viewsheds - Visual Analysis

6. Historical, Cultural and Archeological

7. Air Quality

8. Water Quality

B. Neighborhood

1. Adjoining Land Uses and Property Values

2. Recreation

3. Access

4. Character

5. Utilities

6. Noise

C. Alternative Modes

IV. Proposed Design Features & Mitigation Measures

V. Preliminary Road Design

VI. Conclusion and Recommendation

A. Proposed action

B. Cost

VII. Exhibits

A. Impact Location Maps

B. Feature Maps

C. Preliminary road design documents

D. Graphic illustrations
 
 
 
 

* An Executive Summary will be prepared which can be inserted at the beginning of this report.

Exhibit 3